Wednesday, June 22, 2011

:: logo re-work ::

after the NSS, you may or may not remember, i was feeling a little existential angst. to quote myself,
i identify so much more with the artists and artisans than i do with anyone else in my industry. every time a buyer admired the color and quality of one of my cards or posters and asked me whether they were letterpress printed or screenprinted and i told them they were printed digitally (in my studio, i sometimes added, though i knew that this sounded small-fry instead of artisanal), the part of me that knew what that sounded like to them just wanted to cringe. and then run out and buy a press or some screens and lend my work the credibility it apparently needs. that i apparently need. i have a very "i made this with my own two hands" ethic to my business but i think i'm always just the smallest bit plagued by the fact that ultimately, everything i make comes from my printer. i really noticed this at the show more than i ever have elsewhere. it's hard to highlight what i feel is a key element to what makes up up creative unique -- the fact that everything (except for the wrapping paper) really is printed in house much like a letterpress shop or a screenprinting shop -- when to most people digital printing is basically at the bottom of the printer's foodchain, even below offset. this is something i think i'm going to have to deal with one way or another during the next year, managing my own perceptions and managing others' perceptions.
my first step in ameliorating the angst has been just a very minor shift in how i describe my business. while "eco-friendly and 100% sap-free" is a very apt tag line for my business, it's not helping me convey the things i'd most like to convey about my business. it doesn't really explain what i do.

"design & print studio," on the other hand, seems to situate me a little bit better among the hordes of screaming stationers out there. it puts it out there that i'm an indie shop (just a little "studio" - doing design & print work); and i like how the word "studio" connotes something a but more artisanal.

to go with the new tagline, i've worked up a few new logo possibilitles. i'm striving for something that represents how i see my design work: clean, crisp, minimalist, and modern but with a certain quiet beauty, maybe a little play between masculine and feminine. i'm also striving to show off some pretty typefaces since fonts are a big part of what i do.

i'm eager for your feedback. what do you think of these 6 logo prototypes? leave me your:

(a) critiques
(b) praise
(c) favorites
(d) suggestions

please and thank you.

Comments (10)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I love #3 and #5...... I'd like to see # 5's "up up creative" in the font used for #1's "design & print studio"... can't wait to see what you decide on!
I like them all. well, almost all. Not so crazy about the last one. I can't really articulate why, so unfortunately I can't really give you solid feedback as to why. I really like the circle with all the text inside. I like it because it is modern, easy to read, seems more creative than the others (but not like you were trying too hard), and because I can picture it as a logo on all sorts of different things. If I had to pick second place it would be the one below that one. PS, new tagline is great!
I always love a little re-invention that attempts to align the naming with the doing. I like 2, 3 & 5 the most. I like the intro of the arrow... how cheesy would it be to blend that element with the Us in Up Up? Might be too utility-companyesque. I've always loved your textured leaves, but they look sort of muddled in this small application - or maybe it's just me. I think I'd like to see what an uppercase Up Up in the font from #5's design & print would look like with a lowercase design & print like that in #3's design & print. Hope that makes sense!! Have fun.
i like #2 and #4 the best. On #2 the type underneath slightly smaller so the emphasis is on the name. I do like the type on the subhead of #5. I like the 'R' in the word print.
Great job! looking forward to seeing the final.
Julie, I love your work! As a fellow designer and digital printer I often have the desire to go out and learn screen printing or letterpress to be considered more of an "artist". Don't be discouraged, though, your stuff is awesome!
For your logos, honestly I really like #4 & #6, both of the ones with circles. I think it would be so cute to have little stickers with up arrows everywhere and just stick them on everything you can think of! (obviously you would need to add the up up info somewhere in the circle). I can see how just the circle of #4 could be difficult to work with, from a logical standpoint. You can't print it on an address label without squishing it, it won't fit across your blog header, things like that. I also really like the font of #3. Good luck!
my favourite: number 2
#2, For sure. Perhaps the top line could be a point size bigger and kerned a little less so that it's still the same line length as the tag line. It would just give it that bit more prominence. I like the 'splashes' because they evoke ink and are graphically interesting.

My thoughts on the others:
#1 is too heavy, and the typography is not that interesting
#6, the arrow dominates over the words, which doesn't feel like the right balance
#4, I just think that type on a circle looks dated. And again, I'm just not loving the reversed out thing
#3, mmm ... the two lines just don't seem to tie together to me. there's nothing to hang on to
#5, the top line feels too brash. Could make rework it with a different font .... The tagline is interesting, typographically, but again it doesn't seem to marry the first line.

Just my opinion ... others will surely disagree.
#2 but I'd like to see the "n" in print with the little swoop. Also, I'd make the top line a touch bigger/less kerning.
You need to capitalize on the direction of pointing UP! (Your splashes go sideways). Perhaps incorporate an arrow in one of the U's. I love the circles. You are so talented!
So many possibilities! I'd suggest playing further with #5, because the type below really references your sapsucker series which is such a trademark of yours. Maybe a slightly rounder font for the top to give it a hint more whimsy? The circle ones are great, but to me have a kind of "Brand-identity" corporate thing that I'm not sure is totally you. But I have to admit they would indeed make awfully good stickers...

Post a new comment

Comments by